This lesson was about ERP implementation and specifically SAP implementation. We read a few cases about ERP implementation of which some were failures and others successes. One of my group mate, Wei Jie, asked the group an interesting question. He wondered why there was more cases on failures then successes. I thought about it for a while and came up with a possible explanation. Firstly, most companies wouldn’t want to copy another company’s success. They would want to have their “own way” of doing things and attaining success so that others can read about their strategy. For example, if XYZ company were implementing SAP, they wouldn’t want to use ABC company’s strategy as any success attained by them would be attributed to ABC company. Secondly, although everyone wants to have their own strategy, they will also want to avoid all the mistakes the others have made while formulation their own. Therefore, I believe this is why there are more cases on failures then successes. There will be many other possible explanations but this is just one that I came up with.
There were a few key takeaways from this lesson. Firstly change management. Its importance cannot be emphasised enough especially since this “topic” has appeared in three different modules; Organizational Behaviour, Analysis & Management of IT Projects and Enterprise Computing. It also means that almost every semester I have studied this particular topic. Going forward, it will be important to me especially during internship where I will be heavily involved in business process reengineering. If there were sufficient cases and data available, I believe there will be a correlation between the amount of resources dedicated to change management and the success of implementation. Human beings are essentially creatures of habits and we do not want to change the way we do things unless there is an absolute necessity to. Thus, it is paramount that reasons and impacts of the change are communicated not only to the internal personnel but also the external parties. For example, upon implementing a new system, internal processes will be slow and customers may either not get the same level or service or efficiency as before. Thus, it would be appropriate to inform the customer. This will not only help to adjust the customers’ expectations but also build a long term relationship with them.
Second takeaway is integration. ERP or any IT system for that matter involves various departments in the company. Thus, a cross functional team is always important to give valuable input from the eyes of the various stakeholders. Furthermore, these projects also involve consultants who bring with them a wealth of knowledge about business processes and implementation. It is important to note that even projects will all these resources do fail. Thus, I feel integration is very critical in ensuring the success of ERP implementation. Integration of the current business process knowledge with the best practices, the various business requirements with the software capabilities and many more. These integration will not only ensure successful implementations but also eventually ensure that the system delivers the value it was sough to deliver. This integration can be done by getting users to contribute, discuss and even comment on some of the project details. This will also increase buy in from the users and help with change management.
Here is a short video on Hitler implementing SAP. Although its just for fun, I must say that some of the points there are pretty valid.